War of the Worlds backdrop
War of the Worlds poster
Science Fiction
Thriller
Your data is deadly.

War of the Worlds (2025)

Runtime: 91 min
Release date: 29/07/2025
Production countries: United States of America
Production companies: Universal Pictures, Bazelevs, Patrick Aiello Productions
Overview
Will Radford is a top analyst for Homeland Security who tracks potential threats through a mass surveillance program, until one day an attack by an unknown entity leads him to question whether the government is hiding something from him... and from the rest of the world.
Rich Lee profile photo
Rich Lee
Director
Default profile image
Marc Hyman
Screenwriter
Default profile image
Kenny Golde
Screenwriter
Cast
Ice Cube profile photo
Ice Cube
as William Radford
Eva Longoria profile photo
Eva Longoria
as NASA Scientist Sandra Salas
Clark Gregg profile photo
Clark Gregg
as NSA Director Donald Briggs
Iman Benson profile photo
Iman Benson
as Faith Radford
Henry Hunter Hall profile photo
Henry Hunter Hall
as David Radford
All trailers
Science Fiction
Thriller

War of the Worlds

Official Trailer

Video: YouTube
Duration: 01:57
Reviews
Author: MovieGuys
Its amazing what you accomplish with a creative script, even on a limited budget."War of the Worlds" isn't going to win any awards but its nonetheless still quite entertaining. The notion of the whole alien invasion playing out from the control room of a US NSA surveillance agent, is novel, as is the manner in which everything is nicely brought together. The acting is decent too, so no complaints there, either. Perhaps the only limited downside is the special effects, which are only passable. That said, they still function well enough, to make the whole thing enjoyable. In summary, a simple but watchable sci fi experience. A nice distraction for a wet weekend.Its amazing what you accomplish with a creative script, even on a limited budget."War of the Worlds" isn't going to win any awards but its nonetheless still quite entertaining. The notion of the whole alien invasion playing out from the control room of a US NSA surveillance agent, is novel, as is the manner in which everything is nicely brought together. The acting is decent too, so no complaints there, either. Perhaps the only limited downside is the special effects, which are only passable. That said, they still function well enough, to make the whole thing enjoyable. In summary, a simple but watchable sci fi experience. A nice distraction for a wet weekend.
Author: Microcosmic
Trash. Uber trash. Worst use of an IP to date.Trash. Uber trash. Worst use of an IP to date.
Author: oynx
amazing relative idea to this era , liked the movieamazing relative idea to this era , liked the movie
Author: r96sk
'War of the Worlds'... boy oh boy. I've been out of the film loop recently, but word of this disaster even reached me. I had to check it out for myself to get it watched before I got spoiled. Sometimes the internet piles in to jointly overhate a movie... this is not one of those times. What a mess, there are sadly no redeeming qualities to it. First and foremost, it takes itself way too seriously. There are (I think) a few jokes scattered in there, though they last for literal seconds - everything else is played straight. It had a better chance of working as a comedy, albeit barely. The initial novelty of the"screenlife" (never knew that was a thing until now) set-up is kinda interesting, though it very quickly wears off completely. It ends up getting annoying, especially the constant calling noises - almost gave me a headache. It'd work as a short, not for 90mins! The computer stuff looks quite awful too, the most boring and least creative way of utilizing the whole PC concept too. They literally just zoom in and out for the entire flick. There is one scene where they do the 'Jaws' dolly zoom effect, which is minorly cool to be fair. There is also a piece of photoshop right at the end that is hilariously bad, I'm pretty certain I could do a better job... OK, maybe not, but you know. The whole ending had me chuckling (negatively) at the film, with that aforementioned moment but also with that flying delivery thing. I've got this far into this (overly long) review without noting the acting talent. It has a few good names attached, but none of them do anything remotely standout - but, in fairness, have barely anything to work with. You could place any world leading lad or lass in this and it'd be the same. Ice Cube... I'm gonna let this one slide, because I do like him. Same goes for Eva Longoria. Both of 'em are, erm, not good though. The only actor I'd give a tiny solace of praise to would be Devon Bostick (Rodrick to you and I), who has one scene where his teary eyes look kinda convincing. As you can see, I'm reaching! I don't know what's worse. This movie, or the fact that I've just typed up seven paragraphs about it. We're both as bad as each other! This only avoids the bottom rating from yours truly through comparison. Incredibly, I have seen worse.'War of the Worlds'... boy oh boy. I've been out of the film loop recently, but word of this disaster even reached me. I had to check it out for myself to get it watched before I got spoiled. Sometimes the internet piles in to jointly overhate a movie... this is not one of those times. What a mess, there are sadly no redeeming qualities to it. First and foremost, it takes itself way too seriously. There are (I think) a few jokes scattered in there, though they last for literal seconds - everything else is played straight. It had a better chance of working as a comedy, albeit barely. The initial novelty of the"screenlife" (never knew that was a thing until now) set-up is kinda interesting, though it very quickly wears off completely. It ends up getting annoying, especially
Author: chandlerdanier
I once watched Jake Gyllenhalle talk on the phone for 1.5 hours and I hated it. I watch Ice Cube squint at a screen and chat with friends and family for 1.5 hours and I love it. Data! They're coming for data. They're going to eat all our data! Why not just copy the data? Why not just set up a separate server farm where they just make an infinite RickRoll for the aliens. There is technically unlimited data if you copy that data forever and if the aliens eat the data, does that mean there's space for more data on that hdd? If you could write the read spead of the aliens, you could just give them unlimited data off of some small device. That could keep them eating for a while and while they're distracted, you set up a nuclear bomb inside them that is on a timer and they could prevent it from going nuclear but doing so will cause them to sacrifice themselves for the greater good. Anyway. I like how this movie is shot. It is ridiculous and stupid. I happen to find it charming.I once watched Jake Gyllenhalle talk on the phone for 1.5 hours and I hated it. I watch Ice Cube squint at a screen and chat with friends and family for 1.5 hours and I love it. Data! They're coming for data. They're going to eat all our data! Why not just copy the data? Why not just set up a separate server farm where they just make an infinite RickRoll for the aliens. There is technically unlimited data if you copy that data forever and if the aliens eat the data, does that mean there's space for more data on that hdd? If you could write the read spead of the aliens, you could just give them unlimited data off of some small device. That could keep them eating for a while and while they're distracted, you set up a nuclear bomb inside them that is on a timer and they could prevent it
Author: kevin2019
"War of the Worlds" draws inspiration from both"Independence Day" (1996) and"Open Windows" (2014) amongst others to create this current interpretation of H.G. Wells's classic 1898 novel. The fundemental message of the book - humans are in reality nothing more than a vulnerable race even now in the 21st century despite our overwhelming dependence on the technology-driven infrastructure we use every day - remains the same, but it is indeed ironic this technology should be used to assist in the telling of the story. The problematic drawback with this technique lies in the fact it is like watching a live action video game and the unfolding drama surrounding the dilemmas and traumas the various characters we are supposed to care about are enduring quickly becomes desperately abstract as any global disaster inevitably does when it is reduced to being nothing more than television news feeds and the deceased are merely a list of numbers on a screen. The resulting film only manages to scrape the surface of the characters and the devastating invasion itself to create the illusion of reality without the necessary emotional depth required which only genuine characterisation can provide for it to truly resonate with an audience."War of the Worlds" draws inspiration from both"Independence Day" (1996) and"Open Windows" (2014) amongst others to create this current interpretation of H.G. Wells's classic 1898 novel. The fundemental message of the book - humans are in reality nothing more than a vulnerable race even now in the 21st century despite our overwhelming dependence on the technology-driven infrastructure we use every day - remains the same, but it is indeed ironic this technology should be used to assist in the telling of the story. The problematic drawback with this technique lies in the fact it is like watching a live action video game and the unfolding drama surrounding the dilemmas and traumas the various characters we are supposed to care about are enduring quickly becomes desperately abstract as any
Author: misubisu
Reports allege that the movie uses clips from real disasters and Middle East conflict zones (bombings, wildfires, military crashes) blended or overlaid with alien‑invasion CGI. This is seriously fuc%ed up! What some humans will do to make money from the suffering of others.Reports allege that the movie uses clips from real disasters and Middle East conflict zones (bombings, wildfires, military crashes) blended or overlaid with alien‑invasion CGI. This is seriously fuc%ed up! What some humans will do to make money from the suffering of others.
Author: kurtsanorskie
damn damn damn damn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damn damn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damndamn damn damn
News
Before Gilligan's Island, Tina Louise Headlined A War Movie With A Future Silver Screen Legend
Source: https://www.slashfilm.com

Before Gilligan's Island, Tina Louise Headlined A War Movie With A Future Silver Screen Legend

A few short years before joining the cast of Gilligan's Island, Tina Louise starred in this World War II movie featuring Burt Reynolds.
Elden Ring’s Messmer The Impaler Actor Is Reportedly In The Running To Be The Next James Bond
Source: https://www.gamespot.com

Elden Ring’s Messmer The Impaler Actor Is Reportedly In The Running To Be The Next James Bond

Following the report that said Battlefield 1's Jack Lowden is circling the role of James Bond for the next 007 movie, it’s now rumored that another actor who appeared in a video game, Jack Barton, could be in the mix as well. PageSix reported that Bond 26 director Denis Villeneuve and casting director Nina Gold are looking at a"stream of unknowns" to play James Bond next. One such person is Barton, who played Messmer the Impaler in Elden Ring's Shadow of the Erdtree expansion. That is Barton's only video game credit. On TV, he appeared in Steven Knight's SAS: Rogue Heroes and the TV show War of the Worlds. In film, Barton appeared in Yorgos Lanthimos' Oscar-winning 2023 movie Poor Things. The report went on to say Barton will do a screen test to play James Bond, as will other contenders, including Lowden. These tests will begin in early September and will also reportedly include people like Callum Turner, Jacob Elordi, Paul Mescal, and Harris Dickson. In May this year, Bond movie production company Amazon MGM Studios said the search for the next James Bond actor was underway and that the film studio would not comment on the casting process. It has been a long wait for the next James Bond movie, as the latest entry, No Time to Die, was released in 2021. However, it was expected to be release much sooner, but had three delays due in part to COVID. Daniel Craig played James Bond in five 007 films, and wrapped up his run with No Time To Die. Amazon MGM Studios bought the franchise and reportedly paid a lot of money to regain creative control from the longtime series stewards Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson. The new James Bond movie will be directed by Villeneuve, the Oscar-nominated filmmaker known for the Dune franchise. He’s also directed the movies Prisoners, Sicario, Blade Runner 2049, and Arrival.
The Worst Horror Remakes in Cinema History
Source: https://headtopics.com

The Worst Horror Remakes in Cinema History

A deep dive into the most disappointing and terrible horror remakes, from 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' (2010) to 'Day of the Dead' (2008), exploring why these films failed to capture the essence of their iconic predecessors.
The 10 Worst Horror Remakes in Film History
Source: https://collider.com

The 10 Worst Horror Remakes in Film History

Remakes of classic horror movies like A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Fog, and Black Christmas turned out to be creatively bankrupt cash grabs.
Next James Bond Actor Shortlist Revealed: Jacob Elordi, Callum Turner & More
Source: https://www.slashfilm.com

Next James Bond Actor Shortlist Revealed: Jacob Elordi, Callum Turner & More

It seems Amazon and director Denis Villeneuve have narrowed the hunt for the next James Bond to only a handful of candidates. Here's who's still in the mix.
Project Hail Mary's Best Scene Is Already the 1 of the Greatest in Sci-Fi History
Source: https://www.cbr.com

Project Hail Mary's Best Scene Is Already the 1 of the Greatest in Sci-Fi History

Project Hail Mary has been the definitive sci-fi film of the decade but one scene makes it the greatest in history.